Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The Dutch seventeenth century, a ‘Golden Age’ ridden by intense ideological conflict, pioneered global trade, participatory politics and religious toleration. Its history is epitomized by the life and works of the brothers Johan (1622-1660) and Pieter de la Court (1618-1685), two successful textile entrepreneurs and radical republican theorists during the apex of Dutch primacy in world trade. This book explores the many facets of the brothers’ political thought, focusing on their ground-breaking argument that commerce forms the mainstay of republican politics. With a contextual analysis that highlights the interaction between thinking and acting, between intellectual and cultural history, the book reveals the international significance of this commercial republicanism and it proposes a novel, rhetorical approach to seventeenth-century Dutch political culture.

citizenship --- free speech --- political economy --- republicanism --- dutch golden age --- toleration --- free trade --- commerce --- rhetoric

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

How the essential democratic values of diversity and free expression can coexist on campus.Safe spaces, trigger warnings, microaggressions, the disinvitation of speakers, demands to rename campus landmarks—debate over these issues began in lecture halls and on college quads but ended up on op-ed pages in the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, on cable news, and on social media. Some of these critiques had merit, but others took a series of cheap shots at “crybullies” who needed to be coddled and protected from the real world. Few questioned the assumption that colleges must choose between free expression and diversity. In Safe Spaces, Brave Spaces, John Palfrey argues that the essential democratic values of diversity and free expression can, and should, coexist on campus. Palfrey, currently Head of School at Phillips Academy, Andover, and formerly Professor and Vice Dean at Harvard Law School, writes that free expression and diversity are more compatible than opposed. Free expression can serve everyone—even if it has at times been dominated by white, male, Christian, heterosexual, able-bodied citizens. Diversity is about self-expression, learning from one another, and working together across differences; it can encompass academic freedom without condoning hate speech.Palfrey proposes an innovative way to support both diversity and free expression on campus: creating safe spaces and brave spaces. In safe spaces, students can explore ideas and express themselves with without feeling marginalized. In brave spaces—classrooms, lecture halls, public forums—the search for knowledge is paramount, even if some discussions may make certain students uncomfortable. The strength of our democracy, says Palfrey, depends on a commitment to upholding both diversity and free expression, especially when it is hardest to do so.

free speech --- freedom of speech --- free expression --- freedom of expression --- diversity in education --- equity --- inclusion --- racial diversity --- students --- campus --- universities --- schools --- colleges --- student activism --- student protests --- 1st Amendment --- 1st Amendment protections --- United States Constitution --- Supreme Court --- safe zones --- safe spaces --- microaggressions --- stereotypes --- trigger warnings --- speech codes --- policies --- harassment --- hate speech --- bullying --- race --- discrimination --- minorities --- intolerance --- tolerance --- religious freedom --- freedom of assembly --- academic freedom --- student journalism --- free press --- student surveys --- Knight Foundation --- Black Lives Matter --- Adams --- Justice Holmes --- Fisher I --- Fisher II