Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

How the essential democratic values of diversity and free expression can coexist on campus.Safe spaces, trigger warnings, microaggressions, the disinvitation of speakers, demands to rename campus landmarks—debate over these issues began in lecture halls and on college quads but ended up on op-ed pages in the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, on cable news, and on social media. Some of these critiques had merit, but others took a series of cheap shots at “crybullies” who needed to be coddled and protected from the real world. Few questioned the assumption that colleges must choose between free expression and diversity. In Safe Spaces, Brave Spaces, John Palfrey argues that the essential democratic values of diversity and free expression can, and should, coexist on campus. Palfrey, currently Head of School at Phillips Academy, Andover, and formerly Professor and Vice Dean at Harvard Law School, writes that free expression and diversity are more compatible than opposed. Free expression can serve everyone—even if it has at times been dominated by white, male, Christian, heterosexual, able-bodied citizens. Diversity is about self-expression, learning from one another, and working together across differences; it can encompass academic freedom without condoning hate speech.Palfrey proposes an innovative way to support both diversity and free expression on campus: creating safe spaces and brave spaces. In safe spaces, students can explore ideas and express themselves with without feeling marginalized. In brave spaces—classrooms, lecture halls, public forums—the search for knowledge is paramount, even if some discussions may make certain students uncomfortable. The strength of our democracy, says Palfrey, depends on a commitment to upholding both diversity and free expression, especially when it is hardest to do so.

free speech --- freedom of speech --- free expression --- freedom of expression --- diversity in education --- equity --- inclusion --- racial diversity --- students --- campus --- universities --- schools --- colleges --- student activism --- student protests --- 1st Amendment --- 1st Amendment protections --- United States Constitution --- Supreme Court --- safe zones --- safe spaces --- microaggressions --- stereotypes --- trigger warnings --- speech codes --- policies --- harassment --- hate speech --- bullying --- race --- discrimination --- minorities --- intolerance --- tolerance --- religious freedom --- freedom of assembly --- academic freedom --- student journalism --- free press --- student surveys --- Knight Foundation --- Black Lives Matter --- Adams --- Justice Holmes --- Fisher I --- Fisher II

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

This open access book describes and reviews the development of the quality control mechanisms and methodologies associated with IEA’s extensive program of educational research. A group of renowned international researchers, directly involved in the design and execution of IEA’s international large-scale assessments (ILSAs), describe the operational and quality control procedures that are employed to address the challenges associated with providing high-quality, comparable data. Throughout the now considerable history of IEA’s international large-scale assessments, establishing the quality of the data has been paramount. Research in the complex multinational context in which IEA studies operate imposes significant burdens and challenges in terms of the methodologies and technologies that have been developed to achieve the stated study goals. The demands of the twin imperatives of validity and reliability must be satisfied in the context of multiple and diverse cultures, languages, orthographies, educational structures, educational histories, and traditions. Readers will learn about IEA’s approach to such challenges, and the methods used to ensure that the quality of the data provided to policymakers and researchers can be trusted. An often neglected area of investigation, namely the consequential validity of ILSAs, is also explored, examining issues related to reporting, dissemination, and impact, including discussion of the limits of interpretation. The final chapters address the question of the influence of ILSAs on policy and reform in education, including a case study from Singapore, a country known for its outstanding levels of achievement, but which nevertheless seeks the means of continual improvement, illustrating best practice use of ILSA data.

Education, general --- Educational Policy and Politics --- International and Comparative Education --- Curriculum Studies --- Assessment and Testing --- Open Access --- International large-scale assessments --- Educational policy --- IEA --- Comparative education --- Educational measurement --- International education --- Research methods in international large-scale assessment --- Comparative Studies of Student Achievement --- ILSA --- IEA’s approach to international large-scale assessments --- Education --- Educational strategies & policy --- Curriculum planning & development